Where Did 10,000 Steps Come From? The Real Story

Short answer

The 10,000-step goal began as a product name, not a research finding. A Japanese pedometer sold around the 1964 Tokyo Olympics was called the manpo-kei, or "10,000-step meter". Modern studies find the health benefit levels off at about 6,000 to 8,000 steps for people over 60 and 8,000 to 10,000 for younger adults, so 10,000 is a fine goal but not a requirement.

  • The 10,000 figure traces to the manpo-kei ("10,000-step meter"), a Japanese pedometer that appeared around the 1964 Tokyo Olympics.
  • A 2019 study in JAMA Internal Medicine described the 10,000-step goal as having limited scientific basis.
  • In pooled data on about 47,500 adults, the drop in death risk levelled off at 6,000 to 8,000 steps for people 60 and older and 8,000 to 10,000 for under-60s.
  • A 2025 review of 57 studies found 7,000 steps a day was associated with 47% lower all-cause mortality than 2,000 steps.
  • 10,000 steps is about 100 minutes of walking at 100 steps a minute, or roughly 4 to 5 miles.

Ten thousand steps is the number everyone seems to know, and almost nobody knows why. The short version: a pedometer needed a catchy name. The longer version is more interesting, and it ends with research that puts the useful range lower for many people while leaving 10,000 as a perfectly decent goal.

Where did the 10,000 steps a day goal come from?

The 10,000-step goal comes from a Japanese pedometer called the manpo-kei, which translates as “10,000-step meter”, sold around the time of the 1964 Tokyo Olympics.

A 2023 editorial in the British Journal of Sports Medicine describes it this way: simple mechanical pedometers “first appeared almost 60 years ago around the Tokyo 1964 Olympics”, and the Yamasa company’s manpo-kei was the first commercial step counter. The 10,000 in the name later turned into “an unofficial goal”.

You will often see 1965 given as the exact launch year. That date shows up in news coverage rather than in the peer-reviewed sources, so “mid-1960s” is the safer claim.

An earlier review by step researchers Catrine Tudor-Locke and David Bassett, in Sports Medicine in 2004, put it plainly: the popular 10,000 figure “can be traced to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan” from more than 30 years before.

Was 10,000 steps ever based on science?

No. The number came first, and the research came decades later. A 2019 study of older US women in JAMA Internal Medicine said in its abstract that the 10,000-step goal has limited scientific basis.

That doesn’t mean it was a bad guess. A round, ambitious number was a reasonable thing to print on a gadget. It just wasn’t a threshold anyone had measured.

US guidance doesn’t use a step count either. The CDC’s adult guideline asks for 150 minutes of moderate activity a week, such as brisk walking, and gives no step target at all.

What does the research say about 10,000 steps now?

Modern studies, which use devices worn by tens of thousands of people over years, find that the benefits of walking start well below 10,000 steps and level off somewhere between 6,000 and 10,000 depending on age.

Study Who What it found
Paluch et al., 2022 About 47,500 adults, 15 cohorts Drop in death risk levelled off at 6,000 to 8,000 steps (60 and over) and 8,000 to 10,000 (under 60)
Ding et al., 2025 57 studies 7,000 steps linked to 47% lower all-cause mortality than 2,000; many curves bent at 5,000 to 7,000
Lee et al., 2019 About 16,700 US women, average age 72 About 4,400 steps linked to lower death rates than about 2,700; levelled off at about 7,500
Saint-Maurice et al., 2020 About 4,800 US adults over 40 8,000 steps linked to about half the death risk of 4,000 over a decade; 12,000 lower still
Banach et al., 2023 About 227,000 people, 17 cohorts Each extra 1,000 steps linked to about 15% lower all-cause mortality, with no upper limit found

All of these are observational. They show that people who walk more tend to live longer, which is not quite the same as proving the steps did it. The percentages are relative to a low-step comparison group.

A 2026 expert review in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews pulls this together: about 6,000 to 8,000 steps a day for older adults and 8,000 to 10,000 for younger adults are tied to substantial benefit. For the age-by-age detail, see how many steps a day you really need.

Is 10,000 steps a day still a good goal?

Yes, 10,000 steps is a perfectly good goal. It just isn’t a line you have to cross for walking to count.

For adults under 60, 10,000 sits right at the top of the range where the benefit levels off. And more steps never stopped being associated with lower risk in the 2023 Banach analysis. The authors of the 2025 review put it diplomatically: 10,000 “can still be a viable target for those who are more active”, while 7,000 “might be a more realistic and achievable target for some”.

Where 10,000 goes wrong is as a starting point. If you average 4,000 steps, it asks for an extra 6,000, which is about an hour of walking every day on top of your current routine. That is a big jump to sustain from a standing start. The 2004 Tudor-Locke paper also noted it may not be sustainable for some older adults and people with chronic disease.

In real terms, 10,000 steps is about 100 minutes of walking at 100 steps a minute, or roughly 4 to 5 miles. The walking minutes to steps calculator and steps to miles converter will do your version.

Why does a round number like 10,000 stick?

Round numbers make good goals because people treat them as a finish line and push to get just past them.

Researchers Devin Pope and Uri Simonsohn showed this in a 2011 paper in Psychological Science. Baseball players near the end of a season worked to finish just above a .300 batting average rather than just below it. High school students who scored just under a round number on the SAT (say, 1,390 rather than 1,400) were more likely to retake it than those just over.

The wider goal-setting research points the same way. Edwin Locke and Gary Latham’s review of 35 years of studies, in American Psychologist, found that specific, challenging goals beat being told to “do your best”. And in a 2007 review of pedometer studies, having a step goal, such as 10,000 a day, was one of the strongest predictors of people walking more.

So 10,000 stuck for reasons that have little to do with physiology. It’s memorable, it’s specific, it’s a little hard, and it ends in lots of zeros.

Common myths about 10,000 steps

Myth What the evidence says
“Science says you need 10,000 steps.” The number began as a 1960s pedometer name. Benefits level off around 6,000 to 8,000 steps for over-60s and 8,000 to 10,000 for younger adults.
“Under 10,000 is pointless.” Benefits appear from about 2,500 steps a day above a very low baseline (Stens, 2023), and about 4,400 already helped in older women.
“You have to hit it every day.” One US study found hitting 8,000 steps on just one or two days a week was linked to lower mortality than never hitting it (Inoue, 2023).
“Walking fast matters more than walking more.” Several cohorts found pace wasn’t clearly linked to mortality once total steps were counted; others found a small extra benefit. Volume matters most.
“Your tracker’s 10,000 is everyone’s 10,000.” Wrist-worn consumer devices counted 3% to 15% more steps than hip-worn ones in a 2026 analysis of 59 studies. Compare yourself to yourself.

What should you aim for instead of 10,000?

Aim for your current daily average plus 500 to 1,000 steps, and keep raising it until you’re inside the range for your age. For most adults that ends somewhere between 6,000 and 10,000.

That way the goal does the job 10,000 does well (specific, a bit hard) without the part it does badly (a cliff for anyone starting low). If you need ideas for closing the gap, here are 21 ways to get more steps without a gym.

Where StepGate lands on 10,000

StepGate, the app we make, offers 10,000 as one quick pick alongside 8,000 and 12,000. But the goal it suggests first comes from what you walked last week, if Apple Health has your history, and you can set anything from 3,000 to 15,000.

What it adds is a reason to hit the number. The apps you pick stay locked until you’ve walked your goal, then all of them open for the rest of the day. How StepGate works has the details.

Whatever number you choose, choose it on purpose. A pedometer company picked the last one.

Questions people ask

Who came up with 10,000 steps a day?

No study did. The number comes from the manpo-kei, a pedometer made by the Japanese company Yamasa around the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, whose name means "10,000-step meter". It later became an unofficial goal.

Is 10,000 steps a day necessary?

No. In large studies, much of the measurable benefit arrives by about 7,000 to 8,000 steps a day, and benefits start well below that. More steps are still associated with lower risk, so 10,000 is fine if you enjoy it.

How long does it take to walk 10,000 steps?

About 100 minutes at 100 steps a minute, or about 85 minutes at the 117 steps a minute adults average outdoors. Ordinary moving around during the day covers part of it, so the dedicated walking is usually less.

How far is 10,000 steps?

Roughly 4 to 5 miles (6.8 to 8.1 km), using about 2,000 to 2,400 steps per mile. Taller people and faster walkers cover more ground per step.

Is 10,000 steps too much for older adults?

It can be more than needed. For adults 60 and older, the benefit in pooled data levelled off at about 6,000 to 8,000 steps a day, and a 2004 paper noted 10,000 may not be sustainable for some older adults and people with chronic illness.

Is 7,000 steps as good as 10,000?

Close, for most adults. A 2025 review found many benefit curves bent at around 5,000 to 7,000 steps. The authors called 7,000 a more realistic target for some people and said 10,000 can still suit those who are more active.

Sources

  1. Journey of a thousand miles: from 'Manpo-Kei' to the first steps-based physical activity recommendations. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2023.
  2. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Medicine, 2004.
  3. Association of step volume and intensity with all-cause mortality in older women. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2019.
  4. Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts. The Lancet Public Health, 2022.
  5. Daily steps and health outcomes in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2025.
  6. Association of daily step count and step intensity with mortality among US adults. JAMA, 2020.
  7. The association between daily step count and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2023.
  8. Relationship of daily step counts to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2023.
  9. Association of daily step patterns with mortality in US adults. JAMA Network Open, 2023.
  10. Daily steps as a public health metric for physical activity monitoring and promotion. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 2026.
  11. Comparison of daily step counts among wearable devices in free-living adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2026.
  12. Round numbers as goals: evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the lab. Psychological Science, 2011.
  13. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 2002.
  14. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA, 2007.
  15. Adult Activity: An Overview. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023.
  16. Outdoor walking speeds of apparently healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 2021.

About the author

Kush Daga. Kush builds StepGate, the iPhone app that keeps distracting apps locked until you walk. He writes about step goals, screen time and the small rules that make habits stick.

Steps before scrollingGet StepGate